MODIS

Table of Contents

Introduction
MOD43B1 BRDF/Albedo Model Parameters Product
MOD43B3 Albedo Product
MOD43B4 NBAR Product
MOD43 Validation
MOD43C1 Albedo CMG
MOD43C2 BRDF CMG
MOD43C3 NBAR CMG
BRDF/Albedo Data
MODIS User Tools
Publications
Related Links

BRDF/Albedo@BU

MODIS BRDF/Albedo Product (MOD43) Validation

Reprocessed (V004) MODIS BRDF/Albedo products have been assigned a "Validated (Level 1) Status". This section describes some of the initial evaluations that led to this upgrade in status. Users are urged to use the band specific quality flags to isolate the highest quality full inversion results for their own science applications. MOD43B and MOD43C products continue to be evaluated and validated by the MODIS Science Team and MODIS Validation Scientists.

Validation Efforts Currently Underway

SURFRAD Comparisons

MODIS albedo pixel values created using combined observations (V004) from MODIS instruments aboard the Terra (EOS AM-1) and Aqua (EOS PM-1) platforms showed good agreementin direct comparisons to tower data from the six SURFRAD sites and two ARM/SGP sites in the United States for the years 2003 and 2004. In addition, pixel values from combined observations matched well with pixel values created from Terra observations alone. For specifics, see:

  • Salomon, J., C. B. Schaaf, A. H. Strahler, F. Gao, Y. Jin, Validation of the MODIS Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function and Albedo Retrievals Using Combined Observations from the Aqua and Terra Platforms, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., to be published, 2006.




Figure 1a. Comparisons between MODIS pixel albedos and SURFRAD tower albedos in 2003 and 2004 at Fort Peck, MT, Penn State, PA, and Bondville, IL. Large changes in MODIS albedo during snow periods (changes in surface albedo greater than 0.5) are due to reversals of the QA snow flag (see referenced text).




Figure 1b. Comparisons between MODIS pixel albedos and SURFRAD tower albedos in 2003 and 2004 at Table Mountain, CO, Desert Rock, NV, and Goodwin Creek, MS. Large changes in MODIS albedo during snow periods (changes in surface albedo greater than 0.5) are due to reversals of the QA snow flag (see referenced text).




High quality reprocessed MODIS albedo pixel values from 2001 (V003) showed good agreement during the growing season in direct comparisons to tower data from the six SURFRAD sites in the United States. For specifics, see:
  • Jin, Y., C. B. Schaaf, C. E. Woodcock, F. Gao, X. Li, A. H. Strahler, W. Lucht, S. Liang, Consistency of MODIS surface BRDF/Albedo retrievals: 1. Algorithm performance, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D5), 4158, doi:10.1029/2002JD002803, 2003.


  • Jin, Y., C. B. Schaaf, C. E. Woodcock, F. Gao, X. Li, A. H. Strahler, W. Lucht, S. Liang, Consistency of MODIS surface BRDF/Albedo retrievals: 2. Validation, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D5), 4159, doi:10.1029/2002JD002804, 2003.



Figure 2a. Comparisons between MODIS pixel albedos, SURFRAD tower albedos, and CERES TOA albedos in 2001 at Fort Peck, MT, Penn State, PA, and Bondville, IL.




Figure 2b. Comparisons between MODIS pixel albedos, SURFRAD tower albedos, and CERES TOA albedos in 2001 at Table Mountain, CO, Desert Rock, NV, and Goodwin Creek, MS.




BARC Field Campaigns

Good agreement was achieved in a limited number of comparisons in November and December 2000 between field data associated with an instrumented tower at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC) and MODIS pixel values. For specifics see:

  • Liang, S., H. Fang, M. Chen, C. J. Shuey, C. Walthall, C. Daughtry, J. Morisette, C. Schaaf and A. Strahler, Validating MODIS Land Surface Reflectance and Albedo Products: Methods and Preliminary Results, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 149-162, 2002.


BSRN Field Campaigns

A paper comparing MODIS albedos with field data from BSRN core sites was completed and published by Andreas Roesh in JGR. For specifics see:

  • A. Roesch, C. Schaaf, and F. Gao, Use of Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer bidirectional reflectance distribution function products to enhance simulated surface albedos, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D12105, doi:10.1029/2004JD004552, 2004.


Barton Bendish Field Campaigns

A paper comparing MODIS albedos with field data at the Barton Bendish core site was completed by our British colleagues and published in IJRS. For specifics see:


China Field Campaigns

A paper comparing MODIS albedos with field data in Tibet was completed by our Chinese colleagues and published in JGR. For specifics see:

  • Kaicun Wang, Jingmiao Liu, Xiuji Zhou, Michael Sparrow, Min Ma, Zhian Sun, and Wenhua Jiang, alidation of the MODIS global land surface albedo product using ground measurements in a semidesert region on the Tibetan Plateau, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D05107, doi:10.1029/2003JD004229, 2004.


Greenland Field Campaigns

A paper comparing snow albedos from the MODIS data product with field sites in Greenland was completed by Stroeve, et al. and published in RSE. For specifics see:

  • J. Stroeve, J. E. Box, F. Gao, S. Liang, A. Nolin, and C. Schaaf, Accuracy assessment of the MODIS 16-day albedo product for snow: comparisons with Greenland in situ measurements, Remote Sensing of Environment, 94, 46-60, 2005



Author:Crystal Schaaf
Last Updated:April 2006